Skip to main content

He Descended Not

4 Reasons I Believe Jesus Did Not Descend Into Hell

Easter is a good time to contemplate Christ in the grave and throughout history many have debated as to just what happen during those three days. One view is that Christ descended into hell. Here are four reasons why I believe that this is not so.

1. Lack of Biblical Evidence

Those who hold that Jesus descended into hell after His death on Friday of the Passion Week typically point to four passages of Scripture: Acts 2:27, Romans 10:6-7, Ephesians 4:8-9, and 1 Peter 3:18-20. Vague would be the best description of these passages. Save the reference from 1 Peter, you would have to read a preconceived notion on top of these text in order to “see” a reference to Christ’s descending into hell.


But what of the reference from 1 Peter 3:18-20. The verse in question reads: “in which also He went and made proclamation to the spirits now in prison.” (NASB). If Christ did not descend into hell, what could this possibly mean? In the context of suffering and the following verse relating to Noah during the building of the ark, I make this conclusion(as do many others): that the Spirit of Christ (God's Spirit) was preaching salvation through Noah (1 Peter 1:11, 2 Peter 2:5). Just as God's Spirit testified through the prophets of things yet to come. So, Christ was preaching to the world through God's servant Noah. The people who heard Noah and witnessed the building of the ark failed to believe Noah and in doing so failed to believe the message of Christ. They were disobedient and now are in prison (i.e. hell) because of their disobedience.

2. Early Versions of The Apostles Creed

The phrase “he descended into hell” first appeared in the Apostles Creed. The problem is that the earliest versions of the creed do not contain this phrase (see Grudem, p. 584-586). In fact, the document that dates back to as early as 200A.D. did not contain the phrase at all until around 650 A.D. The distancing of the phrase “he descended into hell” from the time of the apostles further shows that it was a latter addition and not part of the Apostles teaching.

3. Lack of Theological Reasoning

The question must be asked, if Christ did indeed descend into hell after his death, why? That is, what was the purpose of the descent? Those who hold to this belief say that the answer is suffering. But for what did he suffer? If He bore our sins on the cross, what was left to suffer for? If all of God’s wrath that was due to the sins of His elect was poured out on him while on the cross, then what further need did Christ have to suffer?

4. Testimony of Biblical Scholars

Though many wise and thoughtful theologians have argued for the descensus view (Calvin, MacArthur), the testimony of others still must be heard and have its place among those committed to sound exegesis. So a list is offered here of those who see no evidence from Scripture that Christ descended into hell. Each offers a good defense of the text and their own theological reasoning. Though each deserves to be read in its entirety, they are too vast to be included here.
  • St. Augustine of Hippo
  • Thomas Aquinas
  • Milliard Erickson (Christian Theology, 791-94)
  • Karen H. Jobes (1 Peter: BECNT, 235-50)*
  • Wayne Grudem (Systematic Theology, 584-94)
  • John Piper (desiringgod.org: “ Strengthened To Suffer: Christ, Noah, and Baptism”)
  • George Eldon Ladd (A Theology of the NT, 646-47)*

* Some scholars, though not believing that Christ descended into hell, interpret his ascension as a proclamation to “the spirits in prison”. A proclamation of victory, but no mention of suffering or actual spiritual presence in hell.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Generation of Mark 13:30

At the beginning of Mark chapter thirteen Jesus is leaving the temple area and one of his disciples points out the grandure of the temple buildings. Jesus' remark to that disciple concerns the fact that these buildings will one day be torn down. The disciples question Him further as to the times of these events, and so begins an extended teaching from Jesus on the end times.As Jesus' remarks are drawing to a close, He makes this comment in Mark 13:30: "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place." (NASB) So the reader is left to wonder the meaning of this statement. Either our understanding of generation is wrong, or we are understanding what Jesus meant by "these things" wrong. I think there are at least two solutions. The word for generation (genea: Greek) could mean, as some side column reference Bibles note, "the human race". This is possible, since the events have not all happened and the human race
15 comments
Read more

Taming The Flesh Through Suffering

There are at least a dozen books in my pastoral library that deal with battling lust. It is true that this is a huge issue for men and a great source of stumbling to many men and many pastors for that matter - so on one hand I am glad they are there and I am grateful for the insight they have given to me. But I was really struck by a verse of Scripture this morning from 1 Peter 4:1b-2. "for whoever has suffered in the flesh has ceased from sin, so as to live for the rest of the time in the flesh no longer for human passions, but for the will of God." Simply put, I believe Peter is telling us that those who are suffering for Christ's sake have their mind on Christ and suffering and not on the passions of the flesh. The reason so many men battle with lust and fleshly temptations (and I include myself in that group) is that our minds are far from the things of Christ. Suffering in the flesh is the direct opposite of indulging the flesh. The man who is getting lashes on his b
2 comments
Read more

Is That A Bible I See Before Me?

The Weakness of Islamic Evangelism Lately I have been struck by the testimony of those who have suffered at the hands of kidnappers in Iraq. One issue that comes to the front of my mind is Islamic evangelism. Christian Science Monitor reporter Jill Carroll spoke to ABC News of her captors holding her at gunpoint and forcing her to read the Koran, which she did. After several days they asked why she had not yet converted to their beliefs. Explaining that she needed more time she continued to read. Again the question came to her about conversion. Finally and saddest of all, she told them that she would convert because she feared for her life. But this leaves us with a strange view of the Koran and the way that Islam chooses to do their evangelism. If the Koran were powerful in and of itself, those who seek to convert Christians to Islamic beliefs would not need to use guns in the process. That is, you should automatically appeal to your most powerful source. The fact that they use guns s
2 comments
Read more